Define the technical workstream around the matter
A legal dispute or insurance claim needs answers to specific questions, not an unrestricted technology review. We agree the issues, relevant period, parties, authorised sources and reporting requirements with the matter owner. The engagement records independence requirements and potential conflicts. Counsel and the insurer’s responsible team retain control of legal strategy, privilege, coverage and claims decisions.
Collect and explain electronic evidence
We can examine authorised devices, messages, cloud records and document collections, with a documented path from source to finding. eDiscovery support prepares material for review, while forensic analysis addresses questions such as chronology, changes, access and consistency between records. Reports explain methods, exhibit references, alternative interpretations and missing evidence. Technical conclusions are written so a non-specialist can understand what is supported.
Support cyber incident and claims analysis
Incident work can clarify the observed timeline, affected systems, recovery activity and evidence relevant to the reported technical impact. We distinguish confirmed observations from estimates or statements supplied by others. Where the matter involves several providers, a source and responsibility map helps organise requests. We can brief the client’s advisers, answer technical follow-up questions and independently review an existing report within the agreed scope.
Use AI carefully in document-heavy work
Knowledge assistants and document processing can help staff locate approved material, extract defined fields or prepare a first summary for review. Matter-level access restrictions, source references and separation of client information are central to the design. We evaluate the system on representative documents, including Greek and English where required. Legal relevance, privilege, professional judgement and final advice remain human responsibilities; source documents stay available for verification.
Agree the output and handling from the start
Deliverables may include a technical report, chronology, processed review set, exhibits or a restricted briefing. Formats and secure transfer are agreed with the receiving team. The project records retention, return and deletion instructions and the dependencies that may affect timing. This gives the matter owner a predictable technical workstream with explicit scope and a clear route for requesting additional analysis.
What an engagement can deliver
- Matter-specific technical scope and source plan
- Traceable evidence set, chronology and exhibits
- Technical report with methods and limitations
- Briefings, review support or a controlled document AI pilot
Common questions
Are you acting as legal counsel or deciding insurance coverage?
No. We provide technical evidence, analysis and systems. Legal and coverage decisions remain with the appropriately responsible professionals.
Can you review another technical expert’s conclusions?
Yes. We can assess the supplied report and evidence for methodological clarity, supported findings and unanswered technical questions.
Can AI be kept within a particular client or matter?
We design and test access boundaries at the source, retrieval and application layers, with the exact architecture agreed before implementation.
